These are somewhat comparable products that have received the same 4.5/5 rating on Gartner Peer Insights.
They have similarities, but they also have a number of differences.
Comparing and contrasting the highlight features is not going to be enough, though.
It is also important to look at the details that may not be obvious.
Its very first product was a firewall software called FireWall-1.
It later developed one of the pioneering VPN products in the world called VPN-1.
Check Point eventually developed other cybersecurity solutions.
Now, its offerings range from endpoint to online grid, cloud, mobile, and data protection products.
These include both hardware and software.
It also has security management products.
The companys main product, however, is its firewalls.
Just like Check Point, Fortinet also had a firewall as its first product.
Now, it offers several other cybersecurity solutions including hardware and software products.
Fortinet was once listed as the seventh-best company for web link security hardware by CRN Magazine.
Heres a rundown of what the two companies headline security solutions are offering.
Check Point NGFW Explained
Check Points next-gen firewall is designed to be capable of preventing fifth-generation cyber-attacks.
It features innovative security technologies that ensure more than decent protection.
It employs the exclusive Quantum Security Gateway tech built according to the Infinity Architecture.
Below is a summary of the highlight features and functions of Check Points NGFW.
Fortinet NGFW Explained
Fortinet promises industry-leading enterprise security that enables full security visibility for different IT architecture.
It offers threat protection designed for security-driven networks and the ability to easily integrate with hybrid environments.
Heres a list of its top features.
Contrasting Check Point and Fortinet
The next-generation firewalls from Check Point and Fortinet are quite similar.
Both emphasize the need for real-time protection, speedy performance, and efficiency.
They share a few similar features like SSL inspection and IPS.
However, there are some differences in the twos degree of performance.
While they offer many similar functions, tests would show that one can offer better outcomes than the other.
Check Points NGFW can detect more than9,000suspicious or potentially risky applications.
In comparison, Fortinet manages to detect less than4,156dubious applications.
Check Point also promises a clearer view of security threats.
Moreover, Check Point is slightly better in terms of preemptive protection.
Its next-gen firewall ascertains that users only get sanitized or safe versions of files.
Also, original files may only be stored if the user has an additional on-premise appliance.
Find more details on this in the management capabilities discussion below.
The security features and functions can be summed up as follows.
Check Point NGFW Security Features Breakdown
Check Point focuses more on prevention than mitigation.
As such, it provides these features.
It stands out with the following security features.
This is the reason for this comparison to present details most organizations are unlikely to have access to.
Vendor web pages and security advisorieswould show that Check Point has the edge of having mature software code.
In contrast, Fortinet recorded 312 vulnerabilities for the same period or an average of 104 per year.
That is significantly higher than what was found in Check Points product.
However, it does not mean that the latter is not reliable.
Fortinets number of software vulnerabilities are comparable to those of Cisco and Palo Altos firewall offerings.
When talking about the security vs performance compromise, Check Point and Fortinet appear to be doing similar approaches.
Both are doing thorough traffic scrutiny including inspection with SSL/TLS.
They also similarly provide real-time protection.
It was alsoflaggedby the US, UK, and Australian cybersecurity agencies for vulnerabilities exploited by Iran.
It has significantly fewer vulnerabilities and greater reliability in blocking new vulnerabilities.
However, they cannot be completely allowed to operate under AI and automation.
It is also designed to be easy to configure and have a high level of scalability.
Fortinet Management Performance
Fortinet is made with full visibility and protection in mind.
Moreover, it sports automation-driven web link management, which is advantageous for the building of large-scale operations.
The Verdict on Management Performance
Theres no doubt that both NGFWs here have excellent management functions.
They help ensure efficient management while maintaining vast security visibility.
As far as scalability is concerned, there is nothing to criticize in both options.
They are all fond of using the term hyperscale.
Check Point promises on-demand hyperscale threat prevention performance.
Meanwhile, Fortinet offers hyperscale security that performs efficiently, with no web connection impact.
Scaling to meet changing demands should not be a problem for either.
Check Point, however, would likely be more enticing for organizations with its sense of urgency design.
It enables the faster resolution of vulnerabilities.
It is noticeably longer for other next-gen firewalls including Fortinet.
They are also equal in terms of the availability of third-party resources.
Check Point only has 7 menus for users to get acquainted with while Fortinet has 35.
Support
Check Point has a good customer support system, which consists of four channels.
These are email, telephone, live chat, and a service ticket system.
Fortinet also offers good customer support through multiple channels.
It provides email support through a web contact form.
Also, it has live chat assistance.
Its telephone support includes a toll-free line for customers in the United States.
Both companies are known for providing good customer service.
There have been no significant complaints of bad responses to customer calls.
User Community
Neither Check Point nor Fortinet has shared details about the number of their respective users.
However, they both have a considerable user base worldwide given their popularity in the field of firewall protection.
The centralized dashboard enables great efficiency.
However, different organizations have different needs and preferences.
The details presented above should serve as a good guide to finding the right next-generation firewall to use.
source: www.techworm.net
